Products related to Reasoning:
-
Understanding Reasoning: Verbal Reasoning
The Understanding Reasoning series helps pupils to understand and answer correctly reasoning questions, as found in the 11+, 12+, 13+ and other school selection tests.The books provide concise explanations and examples of all the question types occurring in the 11+ together with practical workbook-style activities to consolidate learning.The step-by-step explanations are clear and include 'how to' instructions.Intensive practice enables pupils to gain confidence as they tackle each new question type.Correct answers are provided at the back of each book for quick and easy marking.Verbal reasoning activities use letters and words to explore pupils' understanding of language and meaning.Using methods that are quite distinct from traditional literacy activities, pupils' verbal skills are stretched to the full.Question types covered include the following: alphabet and word patterns, vocabulary, spelling, mathematical questions and problem solving.
Price: 9.95 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Understanding Reasoning: Non-verbal Reasoning
The Understanding Reasoning series helps pupils to understand and answer correctly reasoning questions, as found in the 11+, 12+, 13+ and other school selection tests.The books provide concise explanations and examples of all the question types occurring in the 11+ together with practical workbook-style activities to consolidate learning.The step-by-step explanations are clear and include 'how to' instructions.Intensive practice enables pupils to gain confidence as they tackle each new question type.Correct answers are provided at the back of each book for quick and easy marking.Non-verbal reasoning activities may be used with all pupils, including those whose literacy skills are poor and those for whom English is a second language.Question types covered include the following: identifying shapes and patterns, missing shapes and patterns, rotating shapes/patterns, codes, logic and combined shapes.
Price: 9.95 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
New Essays on the Nature of Legal Reasoning
This is the first book to bring together distinguished jurisprudential theorists, as well as up-and-coming scholars, to critically assess the nature of legal reasoning.The volume is divided into 3 parts:The first part, General Jurisprudence and Legal Reasoning, addresses issues at the intersection of general jurisprudence - those pertaining to the nature of law itself - and legal reasoning. The second part, Rules and Reasons, addresses two concepts central to two prominent types of theory of legal reasoning. The essays in the third and final part, Doctrine and Practice, delve into the mechanics of legal practice and doctrine, from a legal reasoning perspective.
Price: 90.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Human Reasoning
This Element is on new developments in the psychology of reasoning that raise or address philosophical questions.In traditional studies in the psychology of reasoning, the focus was on inference from arbitrary assumptions and not at all from beliefs, and classical binary logic was presupposed as the only standard for human reasoning.But recently a new Bayesian paradigm has emerged in the discipline.This views ordinary human reasoning as mostly inferring probabilistic conclusions from degrees of beliefs, or from hypothetical premises relevant to a purpose at hand, and as often about revising or updating degrees of belief.This Element also covers new formulations of dual-process theories of the mind, stating that there are two types of mental processing, one rapid and intuitive and shared with other animals, and the other slow and reflective and more characteristic of human beings.The final topic covered is the new developments and rationality.
Price: 17.00 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
What is spatial reasoning?
Spatial reasoning is the ability to understand and manipulate visual information about objects and their relationships in space. It involves skills such as mental rotation, visualization, and understanding of spatial patterns. People with strong spatial reasoning skills can easily interpret and create visual representations, understand maps and diagrams, and solve problems involving spatial relationships. This ability is important in fields such as mathematics, engineering, architecture, and design.
-
What is logical reasoning?
Logical reasoning is the process of using rational thinking and evidence to come to a conclusion or make a decision. It involves analyzing information, identifying patterns, and drawing valid inferences based on the available facts. Logical reasoning helps individuals to think critically, solve problems, and make sound judgments by following a systematic and coherent thought process. It is an essential skill in various fields such as mathematics, science, philosophy, and everyday decision-making.
-
Don't you understand inductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning is a method of reasoning that involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. It is different from deductive reasoning, which involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles. Inductive reasoning is often used in scientific research and everyday decision-making to make educated guesses or predictions based on patterns or trends. It is important to understand inductive reasoning in order to make informed judgments and draw logical conclusions from the information available.
-
What is logical reasoning ability?
Logical reasoning ability refers to the capacity to think critically, analyze information, and draw valid conclusions based on evidence and facts. It involves the ability to identify patterns, make connections between ideas, and solve problems systematically. Individuals with strong logical reasoning skills can evaluate arguments, make sound decisions, and navigate complex situations effectively. This ability is essential in various aspects of life, including academics, professional settings, and everyday problem-solving.
Similar search terms for Reasoning:
-
Legal Reasoning
The common law, which is made by courts, consists of rules that govern relations between individuals, such as torts (the law of private wrongs) and contracts.Legal Reasoning explains and analyzes the modes of reasoning utilized by the courts in making and applying common law rules.These modes include reasoning from binding precedents (prior cases that are binding on the deciding court); reasoning from authoritative although not binding sources, such as leading treatises; reasoning from analogy; reasoning from propositions of morality, policy, and experience; making exceptions; drawing distinctions; and overruling.The book further examines and explains the roles of logic, deduction, and good judgment in legal reasoning.With accessible prose and full descriptions of illustrative cases, this book is a valuable resource for anyone who wishes to get a hands-on grasp of legal reasoning.
Price: 22.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
CEM 11+ Non-Verbal Reasoning & Spatial Reasoning Practice Papers
These three practice exam papers test pupils ahead of the CEM 11+ Non-Verbal Reasoning test, including those taking bespoke tests created by CEM for individual schools.Three levelled papers test pupils' skills in non-verbal and spatial reasoning. The papers are designed to:- Develop and perfect exam technique for all CEM 11+ Non-Verbal Reasoning tests- Teach pupils to improve their response rates with timed papers- Identify weaker areas and improve results by studying the answers, which contain references to Galore Park's revision materials for guidance and useful tips- The resource also contains links to downloadable answer sheets so that the tests can be re-sat. These practice papers are part of Galore Park's 11+ revision series, which provides a three-step learning journey that teaches children the skills needed to pass rigorous school entrance exams.
Price: 9.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
By Parallel Reasoning
By Parallel Reasoning is the first comprehensive philosophical examination of analogical reasoning in more than forty years designed to formulate and justify standards for the critical evaluation of analogical arguments.It proposes a normative theory with special focus on the use of analogies in mathematics and science. In recent decades, research on analogy has been dominated by computational theories whose objective has been to model analogical reasoning as a psychological process.These theories have devoted little attention to normative questions.In this book Bartha proposes that a good analogical argument must articulate a clear relationship that is capable of generalization.This idea leads to a set of distinct models for the critical analysis of prominent forms of analogical argument.The same core principle makes it possible to relate analogical reasoning to norms and values of scientific practice.Reasoning by analogy is justified because it strikes an optimal balance between conservative values, such as simplicity and coherence, and progressive values, such as fruitfulness and theoretical unification.Analogical arguments are also justified by appeal to symmetry--like cases are to be treated alike. In elaborating the connection between analogy and these broad epistemic principles, By Parallel Reasoning offers a novel contribution to explaining how analogies can play an important role in the confirmation of scientific hypotheses
Price: 100.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Reasoning about Uncertainty
Formal ways of representing uncertainty and various logics for reasoning about it; updated with new material on weighted probability measures, complexity-theoretic considerations, and other topics. In order to deal with uncertainty intelligently, we need to be able to represent it and reason about it.In this book, Joseph Halpern examines formal ways of representing uncertainty and considers various logics for reasoning about it.While the ideas presented are formalized in terms of definitions and theorems, the emphasis is on the philosophy of representing and reasoning about uncertainty.Halpern surveys possible formal systems for representing uncertainty, including probability measures, possibility measures, and plausibility measures; considers the updating of beliefs based on changing information and the relation to Bayes' theorem; and discusses qualitative, quantitative, and plausibilistic Bayesian networks. This second edition has been updated to reflect Halpern's recent research.New material includes a consideration of weighted probability measures and how they can be used in decision making; analyses of the Doomsday argument and the Sleeping Beauty problem; modeling games with imperfect recall using the runs-and-systems approach; a discussion of complexity-theoretic considerations; the application of first-order conditional logic to security.Reasoning about Uncertainty is accessible and relevant to researchers and students in many fields, including computer science, artificial intelligence, economics (particularly game theory), mathematics, philosophy, and statistics.
Price: 62.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
Would Kant agree with the reasoning?
Kant would likely not agree with the reasoning presented in the text. Kant's ethical philosophy is based on the idea of universal moral principles that apply to all rational beings, regardless of the consequences. The reasoning in the text seems to be based on the idea of achieving a desired outcome, which goes against Kant's deontological ethics. Kant would argue that the morality of an action is determined by whether it can be willed as a universal law, not by the potential benefits or consequences.
-
Do Muslims have better spatial reasoning skills?
There is no scientific evidence to suggest that Muslims have inherently better spatial reasoning skills compared to individuals of other faiths or backgrounds. Spatial reasoning skills are developed through a combination of genetics, environment, education, and practice, rather than being determined by religious affiliation. It is important to avoid making generalizations or assumptions about a group of people based on their religion.
-
What does the term "circular reasoning" mean?
Circular reasoning refers to a logical fallacy in which the conclusion of an argument is assumed in one of the premises. Essentially, the argument goes in a circle, with the conclusion being used to support the premise, which in turn supports the conclusion. This type of reasoning is invalid because it does not provide any new information or evidence to support the conclusion, leading to a self-reinforcing loop of logic.
-
Is my reasoning for math also correct?
I'm happy to help! Please provide me with the reasoning for your math problem so that I can assess its correctness.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.