Products related to Judgments:
-
Diversity Judgments : Democratizing Judicial Legitimacy
The US Supreme Court's legitimacy-its diminishing integrity and contribution to the good of society-is being questioned today like no other time in recent memory.Criticisms reflect the perspectives of both 'insiders' (straight white males) and 'outsiders' (mainly people of color, women, and the LGBTQ community).Neither perspective digs deep enough to get at the root of the Court's legitimacy problem, which is one of process.The Court's process of decision-making is antiquated and out of sync with a society that looks and thinks nothing like the America of the eighteenth century, when the process was first implemented.The current process marginalizes many Americans who have a right to feel disenfranchised.Leading scholar of jurisprudence Roy L. Brooks demonstrates how the Court can modernize and democratize its deliberative process, to be more inclusive of the values and life experiences of Americans who are not straight white males.
Price: 38.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Ethical Judgments : Re-Writing Medical Law
This edited collection is designed to explore the ethical nature of judicial decision-making, particularly relating to cases in the health/medical sphere, where judges are often called upon to issue rulings on questions containing an explicit ethical component.However, judges do not receive any specific training in ethical decision-making, and often disown any place for ethics in their decision-making.Consequently, decisions made by judges do not present consistent or robust ethical theory, even when cases appear to rely on moral claims. The project explores this dichotomy by imagining a world in which decisions by judges have to be ethically as well as legally valid.Nine specific cases are reinterpreted in light of that requirement by leading academics in the fields of medical law and bioethics.Two judgments are written in each case, allowing for different views to be presented.Two commentaries - one ethical and one legal - then explore the ramifications of the ethical judgments and provide an opportunity to explore the two judgments from additional ethical and legal perspectives.These four different approaches to each judgment allow for a rich and varied critique of the decisions and ethical theories and issues at play in each case.
Price: 54.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
The HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention : Cornerstones, Prospects, Outlook
This book analyses, comments and further develops on the most important instrument of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH): the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention.The HCCH Convention, the product of decades of work, will have a transformative effect on global judicial cooperation in civil matters.This book explores its ‘mechanics’, i.e. the legal cornerstones of the new Convention (Part I), its prospects in leading regions of the world (Part II), and offers an overview and comment on its outlook (Part III).Drawing on contributions from world-leading experts, this magisterial and ambitious work will become the reference work for law-makers, judges, lawyers and scholars in the field of private international law.
Price: 120.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
How Judges Decide Cases: Reading, Writing and Analysing Judgments
How Judges Decide Cases is a unique and practical guide which looks at how cases are decided and judgments are written.It examines the style and language of judges expressing judicial opinion and considers the drive for rational justice. The book is founded upon independent research in the form of interviews conducted with judges at every level, from deputy district judges to justices of the Supreme Court, and the practical application of academic material more usually devoted to the structure and analysis of wider prose writing.This new edition has been revised to take into account modern scientific thinking on bias in decision-making and is generic to all areas of contentious law.Newly appointed recorders, deputy judges, tribunal chairman, lay magistrates and arbitrators as well as experienced practitioners will find it invaluable as a guide to the deconstruction of judgments for the purpose of appeal.
Price: 49.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
What are moral judgments and value judgments?
Moral judgments are assessments or evaluations made about the rightness or wrongness of actions, behaviors, or decisions based on moral principles or ethical standards. They involve determining whether an action is morally acceptable or unacceptable. Value judgments, on the other hand, are assessments made about the worth, importance, or desirability of something based on personal beliefs, preferences, or cultural norms. They involve determining the significance or value of something in relation to one's own values or beliefs. Both types of judgments play a crucial role in guiding our behavior and decision-making.
-
What are value judgments and factual judgments about Adenauer?
Value judgments about Adenauer refer to subjective opinions on his leadership style, policies, and impact on German history. These judgments are based on personal beliefs and values. Factual judgments about Adenauer, on the other hand, are based on verifiable information and historical evidence about his actions, decisions, and achievements during his time as Chancellor of Germany. These judgments are objective and can be supported by concrete facts and data.
-
Can you provide examples of non-moral value judgments, moral value judgments, and moral obligation judgments?
Non-moral value judgments are statements about the worth or desirability of something that do not involve moral considerations, such as "I prefer chocolate ice cream over vanilla" or "I like the color blue more than red." Moral value judgments, on the other hand, involve moral considerations and are statements about what is right or wrong, good or bad, such as "It is wrong to steal" or "Helping others is a good thing to do." Moral obligation judgments are statements about what one ought to do based on moral considerations, such as "I should tell the truth" or "I have a duty to help those in need."
-
What are examples of factual judgments and moral value judgments?
Factual judgments are statements that can be proven true or false based on evidence, such as "The Earth revolves around the Sun" or "Water boils at 100 degrees Celsius." On the other hand, moral value judgments are subjective assessments of right or wrong, good or bad, such as "Stealing is wrong" or "Helping others is a virtuous act." Factual judgments are based on empirical evidence and logic, while moral value judgments are based on personal beliefs, values, and cultural norms.
Similar search terms for Judgments:
-
Biblical Judgments : New Legal Readings in the Hebrew Bible
Biblical Judgments invites readers to consider today's timeless dilemmas of law and government, social justice, and human rights, through the perspective of a text that has helped shape western society: the Hebrew Bible.By focusing on biblical narratives and literature rather than on traditional interpretations of biblical law, Daphne Barak-Erez is able to look beyond specific legal norms to concentrate on what the stories can reveal about the "big" issues.She discusses questions such as: What can modern-day governmental regulation learn from the exercise of food rationing in Egypt as a response to Pharaoh's dream of a future famine?How does social distancing in the time of Covid-19 compare with people sent outside the camp as a precautionary measure against bible-era plagues?What can promoters of social justice glean from the demands made to Moses that daughters should also inherit from their father when biblical law did not recognize inheritance rights of women? Rather than offering a historical study, Barak-Erez draws upon famous court decisions from around the world to root her analysis in modern law. Organized by subject matter, Biblical Judgments analyzes how the themes of law and government, judging and judges, human rights and social justice, criminal law, private law, and family and inheritance law are presented through a number of different stories.In recounting the compelling narratives of the Hebrew Bible, Biblical Judgments exposes their inherent legal tensions and what we can learn from them and with them about legal dilemmas today.
Price: 28.95 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
The Hague Judgments Convention and Commonwealth Model Law : A Pragmatic Perspective
This book undertakes a systematic analysis of the 2019 Hague Judgments Convention, the 2005 Hague Choice of Court Convention 2005, and the 2017 Commonwealth Model Law on recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments from a pragmatic perspective.The book builds on the concept of pragmatism in private international law within the context of recognition and enforcement of judgments.It demonstrates the practical application of legal pragmatism by setting up a toolbox (pragmatic goals and methods) that will assist courts and policymakers in developing an effective and efficient judgments’ enforcement scheme at national, bilateral and multilateral levels. Practitioners, national courts, policymakers, academics, students and litigants will benefit from the book’s comparative approach using case law from the United Kingdom and other leading Commonwealth States, the United States, and the Court of Justice of the European Union.The book also provides interesting findings from the empirical research on the refusal of recognition and enforcement in the UK and the Commonwealth statutory registration schemes respectively.
Price: 39.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
The Digest of Judgments of the Supreme Court of Nigeria : Vols 3 and 4
Price: 101.87 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice : Improving the Quality of Judgments and Decisions
Praise for Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice, Third Edition "Eileen Gambrill is unparalleled in her ability to describe common flaws and biases in clinical decision making.The result in this revised edition is a steadfast call for change that also acknowledges the demands of practice.A must-read for clinicians and researchers alike." —Elizabeth K.Anthony, PhD, Assistant Professor, School of Social Work, Arizona State University "This Third Edition builds upon the impressive strengths of Gambrill's prior treatments of the topic to support the notion that critical thinking is a teachable skill and one essential for contemporary practice in the human services.This book should be the default authority on the topic of critical thinking for human service professionals and would be an excellent textbook." —Bruce A.Thyer, PhD, LCSW, Professor and former Dean, Florida State University College of Social Work "I was skeptical about how Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice could be improved, but Eileen Gambrill has succeeded!Her articulation of critical thinking skills for clinical decisions ultimately will benefit the people we serve." —Joanne Yaffe, PhD, ACSW, Associate Professor of Social Work and Adjunct Associate Professor of Psychiatry, University of Utah A balanced and illustrative guide to incorporating critical-thinking values, knowledge, and skills into clinical education and practice Now in a third edition, Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice is written for helping professionals who want to think more clearly about the decisions they make and the context in which they make them.It is a practical volume for clinicians who would like to expand their knowledge of common pitfalls and fallacies in clinical reasoning. As in earlier editions, this Third Edition draws on research related to problem solving and decision making, illustrating the relevance of research findings to everyday clinical practice and policy. Revised throughout, the new edition includes discussion of: The influence of pharmaceutical companies on the helping professions, including disease mongering—the creation of bogus risks, problems, and needless worriesDifferent kinds of propaganda in the helping professions that compromise informed consentAdditional coverage of classification, pathology, reliance on authority, and hazards in data collectionThe development of decision aids of value to both professionals and clientsThe relative contribution of specific interventions compared to nonspecific factors to positive outcomeFactors related to decision making in multidisciplinary teamsNew developments regarding intuitive and analytic reasoningThe pragmatic theory of fallacies Designed to enhance the quality of services offered to clients, Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice, Third Edition is filled with insightful examples, useful lists, websites, and guidelines, presenting an essential resource for all helping professionals and students in the helping professions.
Price: 46.95 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £
-
How do value judgments and factual judgments differ in a history exam?
In a history exam, value judgments are subjective assessments of the significance or moral implications of historical events, while factual judgments are objective assessments of the accuracy and truthfulness of historical information. Value judgments may involve evaluating the impact of historical events on society or determining the significance of certain figures or movements. Factual judgments, on the other hand, involve assessing the accuracy of dates, events, and historical accounts based on evidence and sources. In a history exam, students are expected to demonstrate their ability to make both value judgments and factual judgments in their responses.
-
What are moral and immoral value judgments?
Moral value judgments are assessments of actions, behaviors, or decisions based on principles of right and wrong, good and bad, and ethical considerations. These judgments are often based on societal norms, cultural beliefs, and personal values. On the other hand, immoral value judgments are assessments that deem actions, behaviors, or decisions as violating ethical principles, societal norms, or personal values. These judgments are often associated with actions that are considered wrong, harmful, or unethical.
-
How can one make ethical moral judgments?
One can make ethical moral judgments by considering the consequences of their actions on others, applying universal principles of fairness and justice, and considering the intentions behind their actions. It is important to consider the perspectives and needs of all parties involved and to act in a way that respects the dignity and rights of others. Additionally, seeking guidance from ethical frameworks, such as utilitarianism or deontology, can help in making informed and ethical moral judgments.
-
What are the criteria for evaluating judgments?
The criteria for evaluating judgments include accuracy, relevance, clarity, and consistency. Accuracy refers to the correctness of the judgment based on factual evidence and logical reasoning. Relevance assesses whether the judgment is directly related to the issue at hand. Clarity measures the effectiveness of the communication of the judgment, ensuring that it is easily understood. Consistency examines whether the judgment aligns with other related judgments and does not contradict previous conclusions. These criteria help to ensure that judgments are well-founded and reliable.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.